Of late, I have been reading a
large amount of literature on the importance of play, outdoor learning and
physical activity levels of children, but the findings referenced in the 2012
research study by Copeland, K. et al really made me stop and think hard: “Children
spend most (70%–83%) of their time being sedentary in child care—even when
excluding time spent in naps and meals—and only spend 2% to 3% of the time in
vigorous activities”.
What irreparable damage are we doing to our young children, setting up such patterns
of behaviour for their lives ahead?
Figures from the World Health
Organisation report a tenfold increase in worldwide childhood obesity rates in
the last four decades. The report published in The Lancet in 2017 found that the number of obese children and adolescents
rose from 11 million in 1975 to 124 million in 2016 and that an additional 216
million children were overweight. Along with the report the WHO published
guidelines which makes recommendations to reduce these obesity figures,
including a reduction in ‘sedentary leisure activities by promoting greater
participation in physical activity through active recreation and sports.’ But
it seems that the opposite is happening and, most disturbingly, from the
earliest years of child care.
The study by Copeland et al. involving 49 child-care
providers working in 34 child-care centres in Ohio, U.S.A, sought to find out
the reason behind these and other such striking statistics. They found three
main barriers to physical activities in child care centres to be 1) injury
concerns, 2) financial constraints and 3) a focus on ‘academics’.
With the study having been
conducted in the U.S. the first barrier, ‘injury concerns’, is undoubtedly a
result of the litigious culture that has grown up there and is fast spreading
to the rest of the world. Also, the rapidly changing attitudes towards child safety
and societal pressures on parents and child care-givers to eliminate risk have
greatly altered the play opportunities given to children in recent years. The
second barrier, ‘financial constraints’, seems like a no-brainer to me. How
much does it cost for children to run, jump or dance? The participant responses
cited lack of funds for play equipment and resource allocation favouring
particular curriculum areas. Don’t these just seem like excuses rather than
concrete reasons? Barrier no. 3, a ‘focus on academics’ is, in a way, connected
to the first barrier in the sense that it is also driven by a societal pressure;
that of de-emphasising play in favour of formal learning, often characterised
by large amounts of seated activities. Behind that is a climate of competition
and high-achievement, thrust upon children of increasingly early ages.
As an educator, it is this move
towards focusing on academics, readying children for school in favour of
developmentally-appropriate, whole-child nurturing, that really bothers me.
Something I find myself repeating in parent orientation sessions or staff
professional development workshops is that we should stop regarding each stage
of education as a preparation for the next stage but view each stage as
complete and self-contained. But isn’t it the case that, actually, secondary
school is seen as preparation for university or the world of work, primary
school as preparation for secondary and, most worryingly, nursery or kindergarten
as preparation for school? I regularly trot out John Dewey’s words, ‘Education
is not preparation for life, it is life itself’ (the quote I’ve chosen at the
bottom of my blog) as I converse with teachers and parents sharing anxiety
about children being ready for the next stage or beyond. This notion of
‘preparedness’ is also limited to a narrow performance-orientated conception,
focusing on academic abilities – how well a child can read, write and compute.
The supporting skills that go along with this in many early childhood
programmes are how well a child can sit and listen, hold a pencil and recite
letters of the alphabet, numbers and number facts – all focused on the
cognitive areas of development. The UK government’s plans to roll out statutory
testing for four- and five-year olds in the areas of language, communication,
literacy and numeracy are further evidence of the performance-driven education
culture we have drifted towards.
With societal and governmental
pressure to focus on academic learning, it is inevitable that early years’
settings are going to lean further towards sedentary activities and that vigorous
physical activity will be further squeezed out in the timetable. The negative effects
on health and well-being – mental as well as physical – are already being
clearly seen but a collective awakening needs to take place in order to turn
things around in time for our youngest members of society.
References
Copeland et al. 2012. Societal values and policies may curtail preschool children’s physical activity in child care centrers. Pediatrics. 129(2): 265–274.
WHO, 2017. Worldwide trends in body-mass Index, underweight, overweight and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 20416 population-based measurement studies In 128.9 million children, adolescents and adults.
No comments:
Post a Comment