Observing
my own teaching approach develop over the years, I have seen myself move from
fast-paced, highly structured lessons, packed with varied teacher-led learning
engagements to slower, freer lessons in which students explore ideas at their
individual pace, continually reflect on their learning and find which
approaches to learning best suit themselves. I’m still on a journey with this
but I think I’m gaining a much better understanding of how better to support my
students to be successful, independent, learners.
One
key understanding I have come to is that, even though my students may relish
the idea of freedom to learn, they do not necessarily posses the wherewithal to
use the freedom effectively. They can actually find the freedom baffling and
lose themselves under their own and others’ expectations. My job now is more
weighted towards supporting students to work within their ‘zone of proximal
development’ (Vygotsky, 1978) and to help them set their own level of
challenge. I am learning to anticipate issues which may arise, particularly in
students who have had little opportunity to develop agency. Some things which I
have found aid in supporting students as agentic learners are:
- Being comfortable with struggle and failure
- Teacher and learner reflection
- Teacher-learner discussion and feedback
The
first point, being comfortable with struggle, is as much something for the
teacher as it is for the student. It is so easy to step in when I see my student
making errors or getting frustrated when she/he doesn’t find an answer
immediately. I have to deliberately hold back and allow my students to work
through a problem at their own pace. Maths Professor Jo Boaler, draws upon the
latest findings from neuroscience about the brain actually growing and creating new pathways through mistakes, as she promotes learning through struggle. For
this to be most effective the teacher must create a classroom culture which
supports mistakes and confusion as an important part of learning.
The
tool which complements struggle and failure is reflection.
This metacognitive tool is extremely powerful, both at an individual and group
level. It is so important to be able to articulate the process of learning, to
make connections with prior learning or with the larger conceptual framework,
to critically analyse what led to success or failure. Again, this
process of reflection is as much a tool for the teacher as for her students.
Anecdotal record-taking is so valuable for the educator who strives to gain
real insight into the learning that is taking place. The subject I teach is
music, so it is very helpful for students to audio/video record themselves and
refer directly to the recording in their written reflections or reflect within
the recording itself. For any subject area, exploring audio/video recordings
for reflections is worthwhile because it impels the learner to be concise and
to-the-point and it encourages ways of demonstrating understanding beyond
written form, perhaps using objects or physical movement.
Entering
into feedback discussions with students is often supported by the
reflection. Reading my students’ reflections and giving them written/audio
recorded feedback informs my own anecdotal record-taking. I can then use my
given feedback as a starting point for talking and listening to the student,
probing further into misconceptions, making suggestions for improvement and
aiding students in planning next steps. What I am now going to commit to this
year is one more step in the feedback loop - ensuring that students reflect on
the feedback given. I have found that those students who are doing this
instinctively are the ones making the most personal progress. Ensuring that all students are doing this as a
regular habit is going to be one of my goals for the upcoming year.
These
three tools are not quick fixes or magic bullets; rather, just like the
aforementioned slower-paced lessons, they are slow-burn, long-term-use
supports for the learning and teaching process and require a good amount of
refinement to be truly effective. Building self-efficacy in students certainly
is a challenge but is perhaps one of the most valuable gifts we can give as
educators.
References:
(n.d). Mistakes Grow Your Brain. Retrieved from https//.youcubed.org/evidence/mistakes-grow-brain/
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment